Commentary for Bava Metzia 225:1

אבל מטא זמן חיוביה רמי אנפשיה ומידכר

but when it matures, he charges himself therewith and remembers it. But is the employee then likely to transgress [the law, Thou shalt not rob?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Surely not! Just as it is assumed that the employer must have paid him, because he would not transgress a Biblical injunction, so the same should be assumed of the employee, and therefore he should be believed, ');">¹</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Metzia 225:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.